good a for laugh it also hapens to be a federal crime

source at nimbusters but it will not last

it is perhaps noteworthy that no such letter is referenced at FCC.gov

also noteworthy is that it is cced to the south central direcotr I live within sight of Canada

of course RH is so worthless that the freaks feel no reason not to forge a document from RH himself what a farce the FCC has become


********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from Microsoft Word.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.

*****************************************************************



1

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Enforcement Bureau

Spectrum Enforcement Division

1270 Fairfield Road

Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325-7245

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

May 29, 2008

Mark C Morgan

Po Box 212

Chassell, Michigan.

SUBJECT: WARNING NOTICE – Amateur Radio License KB9RQZ

Case #EB-2007-40003

Dear Mr. Morgan:

Pursuant to our recent telephone conversation concerning illegal
radio transmissions you made on the 20 meter band, where you ID’ed
as AB8AMQ “Woger Dickstein”, this is a warning notice that such
operation is a violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of
1934,as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 301, and carries criminal
penalties including monetary forfeiture (fine) and imprisonment.
Monetary forfeitures normally range from $7,500 to $10,000.


This is the last warning you will receive regarding such operation.

.

Sincerely,

W. Riley Hollingsworth

Special Counsel

cc: FCC South Central Regional Director

OTOH I would like to know why Dlloyd Lavies thinks he is entitled to use RRAP as a platfrom for harasing ME without my repling

Dloyd ofd cry of pain
my reponse to his question

it amazes and saddens me the Dloyd \avies contantly whine about his in abilty touse RRAP as aplatfrom for him and his socks/allies to harras me with endless streamsof thrash

indeed he claims often his killfilles solve his problem but they are unavailing to him

he has his attack blog using my call to promote them as well it apears my mywife and an number of otheer blog besides

he also press demand threats whining that I have not let him take and use RRAP as a weapon to perusue his personal vendetta against me

RRAP is a publice fprumm dloydUsenet and as the linked text shows and I repeat "Usenet users can post messages to newsgroups that can be read (and responded to) by anyone who has access to the system through a newsreader" and that anyone includes myself you and you allies have over the years and right to the present day sought to deny me access to this right by means forging my posting ids to your outragous lies and libel so my remark go along with your in kilfile acouple of years I decided this was not happening without a fight, I promised that I would see to it we were all made equal. you and your buddies including Dave Heil and Md the ham of a thousand callsign chose to make that all equaly unreadable. sadly that was your choice i would have rathered you choose something else

RRRAP can be repaired by simply choosing to tlak about radio and stop forgering other hams and stop posting mostly fabrication about their sex lives

and here again we see that I am indeed alwoed to post to the moded NG